In this episode of The Auto Accident Attorney Group podcast, the hosts break down the complexities of auto accident cases with a focus on compensatory damages, settlement timing, and the attorney’s role in protecting client recoveries. The conversation explains why full valuation of injuries matters, the pitfalls and mechanics of settlement advances, and why following experienced legal advice can materially affect outcomes. The episode closes with guidance on choosing a law firm that has the capital, communication, and trial experience to advocate for your best long-term interests in Marietta and across Georgia.
00:02 [Music]
00:14 welcome to the Auto Accident Attorneys
00:16 podcast brought to you by the Auto
00:18 Accident Attorneys Group where our motto
00:20 is simple We take care of you While
00:24 we're known for helping navigate the
00:26 aftermath of auto accidents this podcast
00:28 is about so much more Yes you'll find
00:31 helpful episodes on what to do after an
00:33 auto accident how to deal with insurance
00:35 adjusters and the tips for preventing
00:37 accidents in the first place But we
00:40 don't stop there This show is about
00:42 taking care of people in every way we
00:44 can That means talking about topics that
00:47 impact your everyday life from how to
00:49 safely prune trees in your yard to the
00:52 importance of adopting pets from local
00:54 shelters My puppy's not here right now
00:57 to show you but tune in for that episode
00:59 which is going to be amazing Each
01:02 episode is designed to offer thoughtful
01:04 often overlooked advice to help you stay
01:07 informed empowered and cared for whether
01:11 you're dealing with an accident or
01:12 simply trying to improve your life and
01:15 your community Because at the end of the
01:17 day taking care of you isn't something
01:20 we just say it's what we do And along
01:24 the lines of taking care of you today I
01:26 want to discuss something that people
01:28 don't often discuss when they're dealing
01:30 with auto accident attorneys auto
01:32 accident cases and claims issues or
01:36 settlements
01:38 the rare situation where a client
01:41 actually wants to accept a settlement
01:44 where we believe that value is left on
01:47 the table Our job as accident attorneys
01:51 is to recover compensatory damages I use
01:55 the word compensatory damages or words
01:57 compensatory damages a lot It's
01:59 compensatory It is meant to compensate I
02:03 think I threw in an extra N in there the
02:05 if we Google that definition real quick
02:09 Compensatory damages are monetary awards
02:12 in civil cases designed to compensate
02:15 the injured party for actual losses
02:18 caused by the defendant's
02:21 action Monetary awards in civil cases so
02:26 money in a civil case as opposed to a
02:29 criminal case designed to compensate the
02:33 injured party That's you That's our
02:35 client
02:37 rather for actual
02:40 losses These are provable
02:43 damages caused by the defendant That's
02:46 the at fault driver In the cases of auto
02:49 accident cases it's the at fault driver
02:51 In other cases it could be a landowner
02:54 could be a wrongdoer And when when I was
02:57 reviewing this monetary awards and civil
02:59 cases statement it reminded me of the OJ
03:02 Simpson case uh RIP or should we even
03:06 say RIP for OJ i don't know He did rush
03:08 for a metric ton of yards So he was a
03:14 hell of an athlete But if you guys
03:16 remember OJ was the defendant So
03:19 plaintiffs technically the people the
03:21 people of the state of California In
03:22 criminal
03:24 cases no individual brings a criminal
03:27 case forward It has to be brought
03:28 forward by the state So in criminal
03:31 cases you always see in criminal court
03:33 the people of the state of Georgia
03:36 Tennessee California In the OJ Simpson
03:38 case it was the people of the state of
03:41 California versus OJ Simpson
03:44 Orinthal James Simpson I don't remember
03:48 but it's the people versus OJ The people
03:52 the plaintiffs the injured That was not
03:56 just Nicole and uh was it Ron it wasn't
04:01 just the the victims It's the people of
04:02 the state of California They are the
04:04 injured technically That's why the
04:06 people are bringing the criminal case
04:09 forward They lost that
04:11 case However there was a civil case that
04:15 followed So
04:17 yes technically OJ won in criminal court
04:20 but he lost in civil
04:24 court and in civil court there are
04:28 monetary
04:29 damages So that's why he had to pay
04:32 That's how he went broke actually And he
04:34 ended up
04:35 um in jail a second time because if I'm
04:38 not mistaken he had to he was short on
04:40 money So he had gone to some show in
04:42 Vegas to re retrieve some items that
04:45 belong to him Uh I don't know We I'm I'm
04:47 going down a rabbit hole I don't need to
04:49 You guys uh maybe we'll have another
04:51 episode if there's any Uh Alex
04:55 Kazerian criminal defense attorney out
04:57 in California that I went to law school
04:58 with Maybe if you want to come on the
04:60 show we can discuss the OJ Simpson case
05:02 You could be I'd love to have you as a
05:04 guest If you guys don't know Alex go
05:06 ahead and Google her follow her on on
05:09 Instagram She's got great social media
05:11 content As a reminder don't forget to
05:13 follow me attorney Ali on all social
05:16 media platforms But I digress So after
05:20 auto accident cases we're trying to
05:23 retrieve compensatory damages for our
05:24 clients The that monetary award that's
05:27 supposed to put our client back in the
05:31 position that they were in prior to the
05:33 accident or as close to that position as
05:35 possible As a matter of fact the
05:37 definition here says compensatory
05:40 damages aim to restore the plaintiff to
05:44 the position they would have been in had
05:47 the harm not occurred covering both
05:50 tangible and intangible losses Tangible
05:52 losses being those that are calculable
05:55 things that have a receipt um durable
05:57 goods like a a cane a neck brace
06:01 hospital bill ambulance bill those are
06:04 tangible Intangible is that pain and
06:07 suffering that you hear everyone talk
06:09 about on the TV commercials or general
06:13 damages is what attorneys refer to The
06:15 topic of today's conversation
06:18 is there are times where we will
06:22 negotiate a claim on behalf of a
06:26 client and the other side the defense
06:30 puts up a dollar figure and for one
06:33 reason or another the client wants to
06:36 take it We believe that it is not the
06:41 true compensatory value That's such a
06:44 subjective thing to determine because
06:48 $10 may mean
06:50 something to
06:52 someone and something completely
06:54 different to someone else That's a very
06:56 small example of putting it When I say
06:58 that as attorneys we believe that the
07:01 compensatory damages are not adequate
07:03 it's based
07:04 on historical data prior cases we've had
07:08 with similarly situated plaintiffs with
07:11 similar injuries in similar
07:13 jurisdictions because depending on the
07:15 jurisdiction the value of a case could
07:17 vary greatly You could have a really
07:20 sympathetic jur jury in one jurisdiction
07:23 and you could have a super conservative
07:26 jury in another who doesn't believe that
07:28 anyone should get paid out for suffering
07:32 a loss of any sort So based on our
07:35 historical data and our advice we might
07:38 think that we need to continue
07:42 negotiations or push this case further
07:45 along in the litigation process or maybe
07:47 even go to trial but the client doesn't
07:50 want to The client wants to settle The
07:52 client needs that money right then and
07:55 there It doesn't happen often It's
07:57 probably less than 10% of all cases I've
07:59 ever seen this come up But I have had to
08:02 deal with it on both small cases and
08:04 very large cases actually And either way
08:07 it it I never feel great about the
08:10 settlement until I get I obviously
08:13 always have conversations with the
08:14 client but then I get the client to put
08:17 that in writing their instruction for us
08:20 to settle the case I will draft a memo
08:23 and I will have their signature on it
08:25 and I disclose all of the things that I
08:28 believe they are leaving on the table by
08:30 settling the
08:32 case What do you do with that though the
08:35 way I see it is that we are nothing more
08:38 than advocates for the clients From the
08:41 moment a client retains our firm every
08:46 single person that works in this office
08:47 steps into the client's shoes So the
08:51 only thing we can do
08:53 is behave and act and conduct ourselves
08:57 as if we're the client If you as the
08:60 client if if you're going
09:02 to undertake some sort of action you're
09:05 going to act in your own best interest
09:08 That's what we have to do That is what
09:10 we
09:11 do The conflict comes up
09:13 when we have stepped into the client's
09:16 shoes and we believe that it is in our
09:17 best interest to continue
09:19 We believe that we're leaving money on
09:21 the table We believe that this client is
09:23 going to incur future expenses that they
09:27 are not taking into consideration right
09:30 now because right now they have some
09:32 sort of life situation that they need to
09:35 deal with where they need money
09:37 immediately I say conflict
09:40 because we're trying to act in the best
09:42 interest of the client but the client
09:43 wants something else So the only thing
09:46 we can really do and I believe it's it's
09:48 the best solution I've come up with is
09:50 that we have really meaningful
09:53 conversations with with our clients in
09:55 this situation We let them know what we
09:58 believe the value should be how much
10:00 they're possibly leaving on the table We
10:02 discuss based
10:04 on other clients or other injuries other
10:07 cases that we've had what we see people
10:10 having to deal with in the future and
10:12 those costs that come up in the
10:14 future And it turns out there's like a
10:18 50/50
10:20 split
10:22 sometimes Actually I guess it's more
10:24 like 60/40 More often than not the
10:27 client understands and they sign off on
10:29 the documents and they want us to go
10:31 ahead and close the case because they
10:33 just can't wait In a minority of
10:35 situations where we believe that there
10:37 is a huge disparity in the current
10:41 settlement value that is being offered
10:43 and what we believe the true damages are
10:46 in a case we actually end up using a
10:50 settlement advance company
10:52 There are a ton of great people in that
10:54 industry and they're good people Some of
10:57 them are friends of mine They come and
10:59 stop by at the office So if you happen
11:02 to be listening this isn't to disparrage
11:05 you in any way but honestly I hate
11:08 settlement advances It's not technically
11:11 usery because there's no personal
11:13 guarantee When you go to the bank and
11:16 you borrow money you get a loan you have
11:19 a personal guarantee So if something
11:22 happens and you have a hard time paying
11:25 that loan back you have a personal
11:27 guarantee that debt is going to follow
11:29 you around Uh if you've got assets that
11:32 the bank can take your assets a
11:34 settlement advance does not have a
11:36 personal guarantee and that's why it's
11:39 technically not usery but the interest
11:41 rates are very high The reason the
11:43 interest rates are high are because of
11:47 the fact that there is no personal
11:48 guarantee The only guarantee is the case
11:51 itself So if that case is lost that
11:54 settlement advance is gone They can not
11:58 pursue the
11:59 client for paying repaying the money
12:03 that they got as a settlement advance
12:05 It's a necessary
12:07 solution in a minority of
12:10 cases It re it definitely belongs Now I
12:14 do know some firms use that as a
12:17 marketing tactic to get cash into
12:19 people's pockets upfront and a little
12:21 bit of cash you know a couple hundred
12:24 bucks but by the time it's the case is
12:26 settled they're paying back double what
12:28 it is that they borrowed And I think
12:30 that it's uh not good practice That's
12:32 not what settlement advances are good
12:34 for Settlement advances are really good
12:36 for the particular situation I'm
12:37 discussing right now where the client is
12:40 really hard up They need to get through
12:42 let's call it the next eight months of
12:44 life They want to settle their case
12:46 because of that because of their
12:48 financial
12:49 problems We can set them up with a
12:52 settlement advance and move the case
12:54 forward And hopefully when we get to a
12:57 verdict or if we get a settlement amount
13:00 before we get to a trial it is
13:03 exponentially higher than what they
13:06 would have settled it for so that once
13:08 the settlement advanced loans are paid
13:10 back with interest they have that little
13:13 nest egg that they really did deserve
13:15 for the injury It's a situation that
13:18 doesn't come up that often but it still
13:21 is something that we have to deal with
13:24 And I don't know if our listeners have
13:26 ever considered uh the fact that that
13:29 situation exists Usually what you you
13:31 hear about mostly is
13:33 um in in during cocktail conversations
13:37 or or social settings you hear about
13:39 people that have been in auto accidents
13:40 and they're like "Oh my attorney didn't
13:41 settle it for a high enough or I got
13:44 ripped off or they they they weren't
13:46 aggressive enough The number was too
13:48 low." You rarely hear people talking
13:50 about how their attorney didn't want
13:52 them to settle and they they actually
13:55 forced the attorney's hand to settle but
13:58 it happens It happens and I I understand
14:02 why it happens and the reason I'm
14:04 creating this content right now is
14:05 because maybe if somebody is in this
14:07 situation in the future you have this
14:10 information in the back of your head So
14:12 you kind of
14:13 consider to think about the long term
14:16 Listen to your attorneys Assuming you've
14:17 got competent attorneys as your counsel
14:21 and they're helping you through a case
14:22 if they're telling you that it's too
14:25 soon to settle you should really heed
14:27 that advice
14:29 Um even if attorneys aren't benevolent
14:33 as long as they are plaintiff's
14:35 attorneys working on contingent
14:37 contingency
14:38 fees their interests are aligned with
14:41 your interest
14:42 because if an attorney is earning a
14:44 contingency fee it's always a percentage
14:47 So it's only a slice of the whole pie So
14:50 the attorney's motivation is to make
14:53 sure that the pie is as large as
14:56 possible so that that attorney's
14:59 percentage or that the attorney's slice
15:01 is a larger slice If it's a bigger pie
15:04 it's a bigger
15:05 slice Heed the advice of competent
15:09 counsel If you're dealing with an
15:12 attorney that's pushing you to settle
15:14 though and uh there there there's still
15:17 money on the table you believe there's
15:18 money on the table that's a different
15:20 conversation altogether Um I will say in
15:25 defense of some attorneys that might be
15:28 doing that it could be a true situation
15:30 where there really is no additional
15:33 value or at least in their opinion in
15:37 their objective reasonable opinion
15:41 There's no additional value left to be
15:43 had on that case And it's actually
15:46 beneficial to go ahead and settle
15:48 Talking about personal anecdotes we had
15:50 a case that uh we believed we we got a
15:54 great it wasn't massive It didn't crack
15:56 six figures but it was a minor accident
16:01 Uh let's say moderate accident because I
16:02 don't want to diminish our our client's
16:04 injuries Uh it was a minor property
16:08 damage accident with moderate injuries
16:11 It wasn't six figures but we got close
16:13 Uh I believe that we actually had gotten
16:16 negotiated a figure that was not only
16:19 reasonable but probably abundantly fair
16:22 and I attribute our staff and attorneys
16:26 here at the office for doing that The
16:29 client didn't want to settle but the
16:31 client was only thinking the converse of
16:34 what I was talking about earlier where
16:35 their a client is in a situation where
16:37 they need money now Uh this person also
16:39 needed money They didn't need it right
16:42 now but they had this figure They wanted
16:44 a payoff They wanted their mortgage paid
16:47 off So in their mind they had tied this
16:50 settlement to something completely
16:53 unrelated to the
16:55 accident Now just like how we have to
16:59 listen when the client doesn't want to
17:02 continue litigation if the client
17:05 doesn't want to settle we have to file I
17:08 say we have to file we can terminate the
17:12 attorney client relationship but we just
17:15 don't operate that way Uh we will
17:17 disclose that we don't think that this
17:19 should go into litigation And again just
17:22 like how uh when we're trying to
17:25 convince a client to litigate a case and
17:27 they want to settle and we have them
17:28 sign off on paperwork we have these
17:30 clients sign off on paperwork saying
17:31 "Hey we believe that if you go into
17:34 litigation there likely won't be more
17:37 money uh there may actually be less
17:40 money available because we're incurring
17:42 additional costs Obviously the
17:43 attorney's fees go up and there's the
17:45 cost of litigating the case but you also
17:48 understand that there is the possibility
17:51 of getting a defense verdict which means
17:54 that you get a big goose egg You get
17:56 zero dollars Even though before
17:58 litigation we had this offer on the
17:59 table it's possible that we get zero
18:01 dollars
18:02 this particular client signed off on
18:04 that and we got a defense verdict Uh not
18:10 something that we love to advertise but
18:12 we had we had the settlement in hand
18:15 prior and tried to advise the client as
18:19 much as we could urge them as much as we
18:22 could They had a particular idea in
18:25 their mind So we just moved forward with
18:26 that and um luckily we had disclosures
18:29 and signatures on everything So when it
18:31 was all said and done we had a paper
18:34 trail to show the client we were trying
18:36 to advise you as appropriately as we
18:38 could this entire time and uh you didn't
18:42 heed our advice but as long as you feel
18:45 like we have taken care of you even
18:48 though you didn't win we abided by your
18:51 wishes That's what it means when we say
18:53 we take care of you We're not going to
18:56 very rarely And when I'm thinking back
18:58 now it it's it would be a false
18:60 statement for for me to say that we've
19:01 never cut a client loose or terminated a
19:04 client It has happened but those are
19:07 really unreasonable clients and there's
19:10 just no no point in trying to mitigate
19:14 that In this particular case even though
19:17 the the dollar figure was tied to
19:19 something completely outside I don't
19:22 believe anyone else would have taken the
19:23 case So if we cut the the client loose I
19:25 don't think they would have had
19:26 representation elsewhere So we did our
19:28 job And uh that probably is another
19:32 aspect that I should touch on right now
19:34 You want to work with law firms that
19:36 have working capital because if a law
19:39 firm is short on cash and you want to
19:43 litigate a case but they are short on
19:46 cash so they they don't have funds
19:48 available they may need to get that case
19:50 settled so that they can continue
19:53 operating That's one of the benefits of
19:55 having a you want to have a cashrich law
19:59 firm behind you Litigation is not cheap
20:02 It takes money to fight You don't have
20:05 to pay anything out of pocket upfront
20:08 The law firm pays all of those costs
20:10 Obviously it gets repaid from the
20:12 settlement if and when we win but those
20:16 costs are paid up front So
20:19 the other aspect of considering who to
20:22 hire and when is knowing that who you're
20:26 dealing with has enough capital reserves
20:29 to litigate not just your case but all
20:32 of the cases that they have in their
20:34 firm to completion to the desire of
20:37 every client I feel like I took about
20:40 seven different detours during that
20:42 conversation I hope the main point
20:44 wasn't lost Uh the main point as always
20:47 is that we take care of you That's my
20:51 entire identity is I take care of people
20:54 So I hope that um if you ever feel the
20:58 need that you need to be uh taken care
21:01 of if you need representation please
21:04 reach out to the auto accident attorneys
21:06 group Reach out to me personally if you
21:08 have any questions attorney Ali And uh
21:12 tune in next time for more general
21:16 advice uh fun topics and things that
21:21 will help you get through life All right
21:24 take care everybody
Don't let insurance companies take advantage of you. Our expert attorneys have recovered millions for our clients.
⏰ Available 24/7 | 💰 No win, no fee | 🏆 Over $50M recovered
© 2025 - The Auto Accident Attorneys Group - All Rights Reserved